The Impact of Different Fee Structures in PMS Schemes

Related articles on expense ratio:

Mutual Funds Expense Ratio Comparison – Direct and Regular Plans

How to Buy Online Mutual Fund Plans

Expense Ratio’s Effect on Your PMS Returns

Unlike mutual funds where expense ratio for each fund is pre-decided for every investor, in a PMS scheme, investors can choose from different fees/structure offered by different portfolio managers.

Examples of Fee Structures in PMS Schemes

Note – Apart from management fee of 1%-2.5%, PMS has additional charges like upfront fees, custody fees, depository charges and so on; all of which is in the range of about 0.2%-0.3%. The profit sharing and distribution commission cost comes over and above, depending on the PMS fund manager and strategy.

Upfront Fee 2% (ONE TIME)
Fixed Management Fees based on AUM 2.50 % per annum
Exit Load: Exit Within 12 months from date of investment – 2 %. Exit after 12 months – Nil
Custodian Fees 0.25% per annum
Depository Charges As applicable
Brokerages As applicable
Service tax, STT & Other statutory levies As applicable

 Example to Explain How Fee Structures in PMS Schemes Affects Your Returns

  • Size of sample portfolio: Rs. 25 lakh
  • Period: One Year
  • Upfront Fee (2%)
  • Other Expenses including Brokerage/ DP Charges/ Custodian Charges assumed at 0.70%
  • Management Fee (2.5%)
  • Exit Load assumed to be 2%

Scenario 1: Charges on Portfolio performance: Gain of 20%

PROFIT @ 20%
Nature of Fees Amount in Rs.
Capital Invested 25,00,000
Less: Upfront fees @ 2% 50,000
Asset Under Management 24,50,000
Add: Profit (20%) on Investment 4,90,000
Gross Value of the Portfolio 29,40,000
Less Other Expenses (0.70%) 20,580
Gross Value of the Portfolio less Other Expenses 29,19,420
Less Management Fees @ 2.5% 72,986
Portfolio Value after Charging Management Fees 28,46,435
% CHANGE OVER CAPITAL CONTRIBUTED 14%

Scenario 2: Charges on Portfolio performance: No Change

No Change
Nature of Fees Amount in Rs.
Capital Invested 25,00,000
Less: Upfront fees @ 2% 50,000
Asset Under Management 24,50,000
Add: No Change on Investment
Gross Value of the Portfolio 24,50,000
Less Other Expenses (0.70%) 17,150
Gross Value of the Portfolio less Other Expenses 24,32,850
Less Management Fees @ 2.5% 60,821
Portfolio Value after Charging Management Fees 23,72,029
% CHANGE OVER CAPITAL CONTRIBUTED (5%)

Scenario 3: Charges on Portfolio performance: Loss of 20%

LOSS @ 20%
Nature of Fees Amount in Rs.
Capital Invested 25,00,000
Less: Upfront fees @ 2% 50,000
Asset Under Management 24,50,000
Less: Loss (20%) on Investment 4,90,000
Gross Value of the Portfolio 19,60,000
Less Other Expenses (0.70%) 13,720
Gross Value of the Portfolio less Other Expenses 19,46,280
Less Management Fees @ 2.5% 48,657
Portfolio Value after Charging Management Fees 18,97,623
% CHANGE OVER CAPITAL CONTRIBUTED (24%)

In the above scenarios, you can see how expense ratio eats away your returns. If PMS made around 20%, ~ 6% goes to fund managers, distributors etc. In reality, for distributor and the fund manager, the return is always positive when you select a fixed management fee structure. In many cases, investors lost large chunks of principal in paying expenses .

CHECK THIS ARTICLE FOR DIFFERENT EXPENSE RATIO STRUCTURES BEFORE BUYING INTO A PMS

So the question arises – Do PMS Fees Justify Their Returns Vs Mutual Fund Fees? In all circumstances mutual fund expenses are far less than that of a PMS. There is no upfront 2% charge or a profit share. The overall expenses of a mutual fund is about 1% to 2% per annum.

0 Responses

  1. Dear sir, Since in above example 20% profit or Loss or No change hasbeen taken, sir i just wanted to know that how we can determine the profit or Gain on the day of investment. be cause we FMC is being charged after adjusting profit or loss on portfolio.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 + 4 =
Powered by MathCaptcha

Popular posts